chain vs belt drive - sunny health & fitness,if you are still a little unsure about which bike you might want to purchase, try out an outdoor bike chain drive or belt drive bike. both will help you get in shape, so whichever decision you make, they will both be beneficial to your health. comparing belt and chain is kind of like comparing running on a treadmill and running on an outdoor trail. it all depends on your preference..belt drives vs. chain for electric bikes: pros & cons,they can be less efficient: this varies. belt drives are more efficient than chain drives at high power outputs and when going up inclines. however, at standard or low power outputs, which is most likely what you will be using if you are doing city riding, belt drives are less efficient than chain drives..
What Can I Do For You?
you will notice the chain rolling over the sprocket of the bike but it does provide a very smooth cycle. a belt driven indoor cycling bike won’t have the same characteristic feel of an outdoors bike like the chain driven bike but it will provide ultimate smoothness of your cycle.
ten years later, it is safe to say that this indeed happened. even though many bikes still sport a chain drive, more and more companies have reoriented their lines toward the better alternative. the main advantage of belt drives is that they require less maintenance, as they don’t stretch and break over time.
the chain drive exhibits almost no friction when there’s no preload applied, while the belt still eats up 1.73 watts. smith noticed that the slope of the two lines wasn’t equal with respect to...
spin bikes have one of two different drive systems: chain drive or belt drive. the belt or chain is attached to the pedals and then connected to the flywheel. when you pedal, the motion is transferred through the belt or chain to the flywheel, which creates the spin, just as pedaling an outdoor bike moves the rear wheel.
each drive system requires a different type of maintenance. chain drives require the most maintenance, requiring both lubrication and tension adjustment on a regular basis. belt drives require changing the belt at the manufacturer’s required intervals, but shouldn’t require any other maintenance.
additionally, a belt is much lighter. a complete belt drive system of two sprockets and a belt weighs about half as much as a typical chain alone. although there are many advantages to belt drives, their main limitation is that they are only compatible with single speed or internally geared bikes.
results: belt vs. chain friction a graph showing the span tension against drive friction. note: this is a modified version of the original graph. frictional losses at 100 watts: chain ~1.5 watts belt ~2.45 watts frictional difference: ~1 watt (1% advantage to the chain)
a conventional chain drive consumes 2.92 watts on average, while the belt eats up 3.93 watts. although the difference is just 1 watt – not enough for most people to care – this works out as a substantial 34.6 percent. but unfortunately, also: that data does have some caveats, though. while the chain drive was tensioned to a typical 2lb
derailleur gears and chains have a tensioner in the rear mech whereas belt drive bikes have to have 'the right tension' set in the belt. so if your bike frame has flex from a rear suspension setup, then it cannot have any variation in effective chainstay length else a belt drive will not work. a suspension setup with a rigid rear triangle, with the bb in the moving part could work with a drive belt.
this allows a belt drive to be much lighter than a bike chain but also gives it inherent strength. light and tough. this toughness means unless you abuse the belt drive it can last a long time with durability to be cost effective.
belt drive bikes require less maintenance than traditional chain-drive bicycles because they don’t use oil. therefore, belt-driven bikes don’t attract as much dirt and are less prone to wear. however, on a rare occasion when the belt does break it can be difficult to replace.
belt drive systems are essentially costlier to produce than a chain-sprocket system. secondly, the power loss during the transmission, depending on how the system has been set-up, ranges anywhere from 9 to 15 percent, which is quite high compared to a chain drive system.
the belt on a motorcycle final drive is made of high tech compounds, rubber, and kevlar. kevlar is what bullet proof vests are made of, so you can be certain is is extremely strong. a belt drive does not need any oil at all, they weigh less than a chain, they can last up to 100,000 miles before replacement, and they need no maintenance, because
what is the difference between chain drive and belt drive? • belt drives are made of polymers, and chains are made of alloys. • chain drives can operate in high temperature and moist conditions, but belt drives cannot. • belt drives are not lubricated, whereas the chain drives are lubricated.
the executive summary: a chain drive is very slightly more efficient, but that advantage decreases as more power is passed through the drive and beyond about 200 watts a belt drive is more efficient. the major point is the efficiency difference is very slight, on
a belt drive runs dry and clean, and is pretty much fit-and-forget. this is a big deal for non-technical owners. quieter. a metal chain meshing onto metal sprockets and running through derailleurs makes quite a bit of noise – noise you’re only really aware of if then ride a belt-drive bike, which is almost silent. more durable. chains get
belt drive technology is mostly seen in scooters and cruiser motorcycles. the drive mechanism works on the same principal as chain drive, but relies on a kevlar belt rather than a chain for a more smooth riding experience. the belt does not require lubrication which is one major advantage over chain drive.
but in case a belt breaks, the cost of the setup is more than that in the chain drive. the power loss in this system when compared to the chain system is almost 6% higher and stands at 9%. that means that out of the total power generated, only 91% is delivered to the rear wheel and the rest is lost during the transmission.
the belt drives can be found in abundance in cruisers, as they are made for munching miles without any hindrance. 2. chain drive the chain drive is the most used and most straightforward way of getting power transmitted to the rear wheel. the chain drive is also very light in weight.
as you’ve stated there that both of these bikes have a belt drive rather than chain -which is great at keeping sound to a minimum. your right, the joroto has magnetic resistance whereas the dmasun has a friction based resistance. these are basically felt pads located just above the flywheel that are forced onto it when resistance is increased.
for some people, chain and bike maintenance is a turnoff that prevents them from riding. photo: schindelhauer bikes - ludwig. background check belts were an adaptation of existing industrial and automotive belt drives, simply adapted for bikes. efforts to use belt drives on bikes
belts drive systems are more pricey than a chain drive. typically, a new belt costs anything between $80-100 whereas the front and rear sprockets retail for $60-80 a piece. additionally, you’ll require an internal gear hub for the belt to run, which will cost you
chain-driven requires more upkeep and are at least marginally louder than belt-driven systems. they are also, often cheaper than belt-driven systems. the primary outlier here is the air assault bike. when it comes to a $700 chain-driven bike vs a $700 belt-driven bike (i.e. rogue echo), it's a no brainer.
i suspect the high price of the belt drive bicycle you complained of has little to do with whether it is chain or belt drive. i have seen high quality carbon fiber bicycles that cost well over $10,000.00 us. they were chain drive. i can't afford them, but a bike as light as they are would be great for a serious pedal biker or racer.